Beijing EAPS Consulting, Inc.

The case study, capital of Red China EAPS Consulting, Inc. in the Custom Book, (2011), examines the hurl focus body mental synthesis of the Beijing EAPS Consulting (BEC) political party. This case study also addresses rough shake off plan itself and how the co- releaseers ar struggling with this confabulation between both mangers. This project plan has show many strengths and weakness. The one social occasion that the project plan strikes put into action is safeguards to in authoritative that the project is completed on time. BEC has taken on the matrix organizational structure.This type of structure combines functional and divisional organization structure styles. There are advantages and disadvantages in utilizing this type of organizational structure. Advantages embarrass resource utilization, specialization, print functional areas, communication and flexibility. Resource utilization allows for the project departmental coachs to focus on their strengths. Also, it al lows for the autobuss to all the nominateers to fix in an area of important for that project. In turn, it uses people a thwart the company who specialize in a field that relates to the project at hand.This matrix structure permits cross departmental communication and flexibility to prevail on different projects crossways the company structure. ( Guzman, 2012) However, with advantages come disadvantage with this type of matrix organizational structure. This structure increases complexity within the organization by leading to confusion among both workers and managers. The managers may not fill out what a certain employee has on their plate. In reverse, the employee will obtain an overload of work because they are receiving work from two different types of managers.Another disadvantage is an increase in overhead cost for the company due to the need for double management. This double management lavatory lead to confusion between managers as to who has the higher anteriority of w ork creating a power struggle. (Johnson, 2012) The case study, Beijing EAPS Consulting, Inc. in the Custom Book, (2011), reveals many advantages and disadvantages to this matrix organizational structure. For instance, the project manager, Ms. Song, and the departmental manager, Mr. Yang, are having a problem deciding who makes the final decisions on work to be completed because they are the same level in the management structure.Ms. Song feels deal she does not obtain the authority to give deportion to Mr. Yangs employees. She is also wary about asking Mr. Yang to give his employees work from her because of his temperament. The loud and abrasive attitude of Mr. Yang represents the rational personality type. A rational trait is more impellent and can modernise angry quickly. (Lewis, 2003) Mr. Yang knows he has this type of personality however, he does not do anything to sprain this problem when he notices that Ms. Song is not communicating with him.Also, the employees do not k now which manager to see to or how to prioritize their work at hand. This causes more conflict between the employees, the project manager and departmental managers. In addition, these employees are not sure if the project manager or the department manager is their direct supervisor. This in turn causes conflict between both managers. There are some strengths and weaknesses that aim been make clear about the project plan in the case study, Beijing EAPS Consulting, Inc. in the Custom Book, (2011).These weaknesses include an overload of individual and police squad projects. The employees need to work extra hours to keep up with tight deadlines. They are also working across department lines meaning they have to brook the demands of more than one manager at a time. When urgent matters arise they are required to add the new work to meet a new deadline on top of the current work load which now causes more distort on the employees and managers. On the other side, some of the strengths include being more efficient and market-oriented. These strengths will foster the company grow in size and profit.Also, being a matrix structure allows for multiple cross functional groups to work together. This functions the company work in a team milieu with collaboration across all departmental boarders. Kloppenborg, Shriberg, and Venkattaman in Project Leadership (2003) discuss many factors about working in a team environment and the type of team behavior that is needed to foster balance the elaborateness and management problems facing the Beijing EAPS Consulting company. To begin, the team environment needs a leader that is committed to the company and to them.This leader also needs knowledge of the project at hand, as well as the skills to do facilitated the project completion. Also, within this team environment it is a good idea to bring in the team members to participate in the 5 classical team development steps. These include forming, storming, norming, preforming a nd adjourning. By bringing in the entire team, a sense of community and rapport is built with the rest of the team. This helps to create a split cohesive and happier team environment. Team behavior is very important for a growing company like BEC. They need to make sure that heir employees have the correct company vision and attitude to expand. bingle of the big factors in getting a team together is to make sure that they socialize. They need to get to know each other and to apprehend their team members backgrounds both personally and professionally, along with their skills and behaviors they emanate. This will help lead to respect within the team environment. One of the major factors BEC is missing within its team environment is ground rules and codes of conduct. This helps the team share in understanding and expectations of the team as a whole.This implementation would help promote the correct behavior for any given situation within the team environment. These rules would also let them know who is in charge and who they report to for a specific project or goal they have been assigned. (Exforsys, 2010). Once you have a team in place, the next important goal is to make sure that your projects are completed on time. There are many ways safeguards and project planning can be done to mitigate the risk of being late for a project completion. The first thing that would need to be done is a Work Base Structure (WBS).This would insure that all aspects of the project have been planned out with timelines and agendums of smaller milestones. The WBS would take into narration any risk management planning that would need to occur along with any communication planning. Another great safeguard is to lay down on some time to the end of the project deadline for any unforeseen events but have a set firm deadline. This firm deadline will give the project team a sense of business to get the project done within that timeframe. This is a commitment from, not just the company , but the sponsors, team and project managers.In saying that, the project manager would need to track the mature of the work completed and the schedule to make sure that everything is running smoothly. Once milestones are met upper management would be notified as to the progress of the project. (Phillips, 2004) Every company needs a designed structure for communication between employees and management. The employees need to understand the reporting structure up though management and whether they are reporting to a project manager or a department manager However, it is not just the employees that need this definition of reporting structure but the managers need it as well.When the project manager is developing the team they need to create a community type of feeling within the team environment. This will help to insure that there is communication and good rapport with the team. Finally, making sure that a team stays on track and meets deadlines is a major under taking for the projec t manager. They need to build a WBS and take into account safeguards to insure that deadlines are met.